Related to generating a robot control policy from demonstrations collected via kinesthetic teaching of a robot

ABSTRACT

Generating a robot control policy that regulates both motion control and interaction with an environment and/or includes a learned potential function and/or dissipative field. Some implementations relate to resampling temporally distributed data points to generate spatially distributed data points, and generating the control policy using the spatially distributed data points. Some implementations additionally or alternatively relate to automatically determining a potential gradient for data points, and generating the control policy using the automatically determined potential gradient. Some implementations additionally or alternatively relate to determining and assigning a prior weight to each of the data points of multiple groups, and generating the control policy using the weights. Some implementations additionally or alternatively relate to defining and using non-uniform smoothness parameters at each data point, defining and using d parameters for stiffness and/or damping at each data point, and/or obviating the need to utilize virtual data points in generating the control policy.

BACKGROUND

Various techniques have been proposed to enable robots to performvarious tasks. For example, some techniques enable a user tokinesthetically teach the robot to follow a particular trajectory. Forinstance, the user may physically manipulate a robot arm to cause areference point of an end effector of the robot arm to traverse theparticular trajectory and that particular traversed trajectory maythereafter be repeatable by the robot arm. However, those and othertechniques may suffer from one or more drawbacks, such as thosedescribed herein.

SUMMARY

Some implementations of this specification are directed to methods andapparatus for generating a robot control policy based on data pointsthat are based on robot sensor data generated during one or morephysical manipulations of the robot by a user, such as a control policythat regulates both robot motion and robot interaction with theenvironment. A physical manipulation of a robot by a user is alsoreferred to herein as a “kinesthetic teaching”, and may involve the userphysically interacting with a robot to cause a reference point of therobot to move along a trajectory from a starting point to a targetpoint. As one particular example of a kinesthetic teaching, the user maycause a reference point of an end effector of the robot to move to a“target point” that is an electrical outlet (i.e., a kinestheticteaching of placing a plug in the electrical outlet). This user-causedmovement results in the robot traversing a multi-dimensional trajectorythat can be described (e.g., by collected sensor data of the robot) inboth robot work space and configuration space.

As used herein, the term “demonstration” refers to a group of datapoints for a corresponding kinesthetic teaching of a robot. As usedherein, the term “data point” refers to data that describes a state of arobot at a corresponding time of the data point, and that alsooptionally describes additional parameters at the corresponding time.The state of the robot may be described in joint space (e.g., as thepositions of each of the actuators of the robot) and/or task space(e.g., as the position and orientation of an end effector or othercomponent of the robot). The state of the robot for a given data pointcan be based on sensor data from sensor(s) (e.g., joint positionsensors) of the robot at a corresponding point in time (e.g., the statemay strictly conform to the sensor data at the point in time). Theadditional parameter(s) that may also be described by a data pointinclude, for example, stiffness and/or other parameter(s). Theadditional parameter(s) may be based on user input, other robot sensordata, etc. Moreover, as described herein, various further parameters maybe assigned (i.e., stored in association with in one or more computerreadable media) to each of a plurality of data points of ademonstration. For example, damping parameter(s), smoothnessparameter(s), a prior weight, and/or a potential gradient may beassigned to a data point as described in detail herein. Additionaldescription is provided herein of demonstrations and data points.

In some implementations, generating the control policy includes usingthe data points of one or more demonstrations in learning anon-parametric potential function for use in the control policy, wherethe learned non-parametric potential function has a global minimum thatis based on a target point(s) (i.e., “end” data point(s)) of thedemonstration(s) used in generating the control policy. In some of thoseimplementations, the data points are further used in learning adissipative field for use in the control policy. In someimplementations, in learning the potential function and/or thedissipative field, constrained optimization problem(s) are solved usingthe data points as known parameters. The generated control policyenables a robot to move from any initial configuration to a desiredtarget position: (1) from any of a plurality of “starting” states; (2)while adapting its motion in real-time to changing environmentalconditions; and/or (3) while adapting stiffness and/or other parametersof the robot.

Implementations of this specification are related to variousimprovements in generating such a control policy that regulates bothmotion control and robot interaction with the environment and/or thatincludes a learned non-parametric potential function and/or dissipativefield. In various implementations, the improvements improve performanceof the control policy, improve learning of the potential function and/ordissipative field of the control policy, and/or achieve other benefits.

Some implementations relate to resampling temporally distributed datapoints of a demonstration to generate spatially distributed data points,and generating a control policy using the spatially distributed datapoints (e.g., in lieu of the temporally distributed data points). Insome of those implementations, resampling the temporally distributeddata points to generate spatially distributed data points includesinterpolating one or more (e.g., all) of the spatially distributed datapoints. In other words, one or more of the spatially distributed datapoints are “inferred” data points that are inferred based on thetemporally distributed data points. In some of the interpolationimplementations, a spatially distributed data point is interpolatedbased on a total spatial length of the temporal data points (i.e., atotal length along a trajectory that passes through each of thetemporally distributed data points) and/or based on a spatial lengththat is particular to that spatially distributed data point (i.e., thespatial length from the beginning of the trajectory to a correspondingtemporal data point).

Some implementations additionally or alternatively relate toautomatically determining a potential gradient for one or more (e.g.,all) data points, and generating a control policy using theautomatically determined potential gradient. In some implementations,the potential gradient to assign to each of the data points of ademonstration is determined based on a total spatial length, a totaltime, and/or average damping of the demonstration.

Some implementations additionally or alternatively relate to determiningand assigning a prior weight to each of the data points of one or moredemonstrations. The prior weight of each data point is used to determinean energy contribution of the data point and that energy contributionused in generating the control policy (e.g., in learning the potentialfunction for use in the control policy). The prior weight of a datapoint can be determined as a function of the spatial distances from thatdata point to other data points of one or more demonstrations being usedin generating the control policy. If a given data point has a largequantity of other data points that are spatially close, the weight ofthe given data point will be less than it would if the given data pointdoes not have any spatially close other data points

Some implementations additionally or alternatively relate to definingnon-uniform smoothness parameters for each data point, and using thenon-uniform smoothness parameters of the data points in generating acontrol policy. In some implementations of defining non-uniformsmoothness parameters, a frame is associated with each data point and,at each data point, smoothness is defined with d parameters (in contrastto a single parameter), where d is the task dimension.

Some implementations additionally or alternatively relate to using dparameters (where d is the task dimension) to define stiffness for eachdata point, using d parameters to define damping for each data point,and using the defined stiffness and damping for each of the data pointsin generating a control policy. For example, the stiffness and dampingfor a given data point can be defined with d parameters with respect toa frame associated with the given data point.

Some implementations additionally or alternatively relate to obviatingthe need to utilize virtual data points in generating a control policyby, for example, modifying one or more optimization constraints toensure existence of a solution in generating the control policy.

In some implementations, a method implemented by one or more processorsis provided that includes receiving a group of data points generatedbased on sensor data from one or more sensors of a robot during physicalmanipulation of the robot. The physical manipulation is by a user totraverse a reference point of the robot from an initial point to atarget point. The data points of the group are uniformly distributedover time and each define a state of the robot at a corresponding time.The method further includes resampling the group of data points togenerate a spatial group of spatially distributed data points that arespatially uniformly distributed; and generating a control policy thatregulates both robot motion and robot interaction with an environment.Generating the control policy includes using the spatial group ofspatially distributed data points in learning a non-parametric potentialfunction for use in the control policy.

This method and other implementations of technology disclosed herein mayeach optionally include one or more of the following features.

In some implementations, the method further includes controlling a robotbased on the control policy.

In some implementations, resampling the group of data points to generatethe spatial group of spatially distributed data points includes:determining a total spatial length of the group of data points; andgenerating the plurality of the spatially distributed data points basedon the total spatial length. In some of those implementations,generating a given spatially distributed data point, of the plurality ofspatially distributed data points, based on the total spatial lengthincludes: generating the given spatially distributed data point based onthe total spatial length and based on a spatial length of a subgroup ofthe data points of the group.

In some implementations, the method further includes: determining atotal spatial length of the group of data points; generating a potentialgradient based on the total spatial length; and assigning the potentialgradient to each of the spatially distributed data points of the spatialgroup. In some of those implementations, generating the control policyfurther includes using the potential gradient for the spatiallydistributed data points in learning the non-parametric potentialfunction. In various implementations generating the potential gradientbased on the total spatial length includes: calculating the potentialgradient as a function of the total spatial length and a total timeand/or an average damping along the trajectory.

In some implementations, the method further includes, for each of thespatially distributed data points of the spatial group, assigningnon-uniform smoothness parameters to the spatially distributed datapoint. In some of those implementations, generating the control policyfurther includes using the non-uniform smoothness parameters for thespatially distributed data points in learning the non-parametricpotential function.

In some implementations, the method further includes: defining a uniqueframe for each of the spatially distributed data points of the spatialgroup; and assigning a smoothness parameter to each of the unique framesfor the spatially distributed data points. In some of thoseimplementations, generating the control policy further includes usingthe smoothness parameters for the spatially distributed data points inlearning the non-parametric potential function.

In some implementations, generating the control policy is independent ofgenerating any virtual data points that mirror corresponding ones of thedata points.

In some implementations, a method implemented by one or more processorsis provided that includes determining a total spatial length of a groupof data points. The group of data points are generated based on sensordata from one or more sensors of a robot during physical manipulation ofthe robot. The physical manipulation is by a user to traverse areference point of the robot from an initial point to a target point.The method further includes generating a potential gradient based on thetotal spatial length, assigning the potential gradient to each of thedata points of the group, and generating a control policy that regulatesboth robot motion and robot interaction with an environment. Generatingthe control policy includes using the data points with the assignedpotential gradient in learning a potential function for use in thecontrol policy.

This method and other implementations of technology disclosed herein mayeach optionally include one or more of the following features.

In some implementations, the method further includes controlling a robotbased on the control policy.

In some implementations, the method further includes, for each of thedata points of the group, assigning non-uniform smoothness parameters tothe data point. In some of those implementations, generating the controlpolicy further includes using the non-uniform smoothness parameters forthe data points in learning the potential function.

In some implementations, generating the control policy is independent ofgenerating any virtual data points that mirror corresponding ones of thedata points.

In some implementations, generating the potential gradient based on thetotal spatial length includes: calculating the potential gradient as afunction of the total spatial length, an average damping of the group,and a total time of the group.

In some implementations, a method implemented by one or more processorsis provided that includes identifying data points, including at least afirst group of data points generated based on robot sensor output duringa first user-guided robot manipulation. The method further includes, foreach of the data points: determining a plurality of spatial distances;and generating a prior weight for the data point based on the spatialdistances. Each of the spatial distances are between the data point anda corresponding additional data point of the data points. The methodfurther includes determining an energy contribution for each of the datapoints based on the data point and based on the prior weight for thedata point. The method further includes generating a control policy thatregulates both robot motion and robot interaction with an environment.Generating the control policy includes using the energy contributionsfor the data points in learning a potential function for use in thecontrol policy.

This method and other implementations of technology disclosed herein mayeach optionally include one or more of the following features.

In some implementations, the method further includes controlling a robotbased on the control policy.

In some implementations, the prior weight for a given data point of thedata points is inversely proportional to proximity of the spatialdistances for the given data point.

In some implementations, the method further includes, for each of thedata points, assigning non-uniform smoothness parameters to the datapoint. In some of those implementations, determining the energycontribution for each of the data points is further based on thenon-uniform smoothness parameters for the data point.

In some implementations, the method further includes: identifying a taskparameter associated with the first user-guided robot manipulation; anddetermining the non-uniform smoothness parameters for the data pointsbased on the task parameter.

In some implementations, generating the control policy is independent ofgenerating any virtual data points that mirror corresponding ones of thedata points.

In some implementations, the first group of data points and the secondgroup of data points are each spatially uniformly distributed. In someof those implementations, the method further includes generating thefirst group of data points based on resampling an initial first group ofdata points that are uniformly distributed over time.

In some implementations, the data points further include: a second groupof data points generated based on robot sensor output during a seconduser-guided robot manipulation.

Other implementations may include one or more non-transitory computerreadable storage media storing instructions executable by a processor(e.g., a central processing unit (CPU) or graphics processing unit(GPU)) to perform a method such as one or more of the methods describedabove. Yet another implementation may include a system of one or morecomputers and/or one or more robots that include one or more processorsoperable to execute stored instructions to perform a method such as oneor more (e.g., all) aspects of one or more of the methods describedabove.

It should be appreciated that all combinations of the foregoing conceptsand additional concepts described in greater detail herein arecontemplated as being part of the subject matter disclosed herein. Forexample, all combinations of claimed subject matter appearing at the endof this disclosure are contemplated as being part of the subject matterdisclosed herein.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates an example environment in which a robot controlpolicy may be generated according to various implementations disclosedherein.

FIG. 2 illustrates an example of a robot that may be utilized in FIG. 1,an example object, and illustrates a user physically manipulating therobot during a kinesthetic teaching.

FIG. 3 illustrates a graphical representation of an example of apotential function of a control policy according to variousimplementations described herein.

FIG. 4 illustrates a two-dimensional example of positional components ofa temporally distributed group of data points and a spatiallydistributed group of data points.

FIG. 5A illustrates a two-dimensional example of positional componentsof three separate groups of data points.

FIG. 5B illustrates a two-dimensional example of positional componentsof a demonstration.

FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating an example method according tovarious implementations disclosed herein.

FIG. 7 schematically depicts an example architecture of a robot.

FIG. 8 schematically depicts an example architecture of a computersystem.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Implementations of this specification are related to variousimprovements in generating a control policy that regulates both motioncontrol and robot interaction with the environment and/or that includesa learned non-parametric potential function and/or dissipative field. Insome implementations, the improvements improve performance of thecontrol policy, improve learning of the potential function and/ordissipative field of the control policy, and/or achieve other benefits.

To enhance the readability of equations used herein, the followingconvention is utilized throughout the specification: typeface to referto scalars (e.g. a), lowercase bold font for vectors (e.g. a), anduppercase bold font for matrices (e.g. A). Unless otherwise specified,the following notations are utilized with their unit specified inparenthesis:

-   -   Potential energy terms Φ and ϕ₀ (Joule).    -   When referred to linear motions: state variable ξ (m), stiffness        S (N/m), damping D (N·s/m), force f(N), and dissipative field ψ        (N).    -   When referred to angular motions: state variable ξ (rad),        stiffness S (Nm/rad), damping D (N·m·s/rad), torque f (N·m), and        dissipative field ψ (N·m).

Spatial Resampling of Data Points

Some implementations described herein relate to resampling temporallydistributed data points to generate spatially distributed data points,and generating a control policy using the spatially distributed datapoints.

Robot sensor data is typically sampled at a fixed sampling rate (e.g.,50 Hz, 100 Hz, or other rate). Accordingly, data points that are basedon the robot sensor data are uniformly distributed over time. Asdescribed in detail herein, the data points can each include values thatdefine a state of a robot at a corresponding time of the data point, andthat also optionally describe additional parameters at the correspondingtime. As described in detail herein, the state of a robot at a givenpoint in time can be described in joint space and/or task space, and canbe defined with values that strictly conform to the robot sensor data atthe given point in time and/or that are derived from the robot sensordata at the given point in time. The spatial resampling of data pointsof a demonstration occurs before prior weights, smoothness parameters,etc. are assigned to the data points. Because the data points of ademonstration are uniformly distributed over time and are based on robotsensor data generated during human manipulation (kinesthetic teaching)of a robot—a greater quantity of data points will often be present inthose segment(s) of a trajectory where the human “slowed down” whilemanipulating the robot. For example, a greater density of data pointsmay be present near the beginning of a manipulation, an end of amanipulation, or other segment(s) of a manipulation where the human“slowed down” while manipulating the robot.

In generating a control policy based on the data points of ademonstration, such “overweighting” of data points in certain segment(s)of a demonstration may have unintended consequence(s). For example, inlearning a potential function for use in the control policy, suchoverweighting can cause the learning to be badly-conditioned, leading toa potential function that is unduly biased toward the overweight datapoints.

In view of these and/or other considerations, implementations disclosedherein resample the data points of a demonstration uniformly in space(in contrast to time). In other words, a temporally distributed group ofdata points is transformed to a spatially distributed group of datapoints. Further, in those implementations, the spatially distributedgroup of data points are then utilized in generating the control policy(in lieu of the temporally distributed data points). This may result inbetter-conditioned learning (as compared to temporally distributed datapoints) of a control policy (e.g., of a potential function of thecontrol policy), which may improve performance of the control policy.

Turning to FIG. 4, a two-dimensional example is illustrated ofpositional components of a temporally distributed group of data points401A and a spatially distributed group of data points 401B. In theexample of FIG. 4, distance between the data points is indicative ofspatial distance. Although the example of FIG. 4 is a two-dimensionalexample of positional components of data points, it is understood thatin practice the data points will often express position in athree-dimensional space (and may also express additional dimensions thatdefine orientation and/or robot joint space).

The temporally distributed group of data points 401A include a startingdata point 401A1 (illustrated as a square), additional data points401A2, 401A3, etc., and a target/end data point 401AN (illustrated as acircle). The temporally distributed group of data points 401A are basedon sensor data generated by sensors of a robot during a kinestheticteaching where a user manipulates a robot reference point of the robotfrom a starting point (corresponding to data point 401A1) to a targetpoint (corresponding to data point 401AN). As illustrated, the datapoints of segments A and C are spatially more densely distributed thanthose of segment B. This can be a result of the robot generating sensordata at a fixed sampling rate, and the user moving the robot more slowlyat the beginning (segment A) and the end (segment C) of the manipulationduring the kinesthetic teaching. Although FIG. 4 illustrates an examplewhere the more densely populated segments are at the beginning and endof the manipulation, in many situations the more densely populatedsegments may appear in additional or alternative portions of themanipulation. For example, the user may additionally or alternativelymove the robot more slowly at the middle of the manipulation during akinesthetic teaching.

The spatially distributed group of data points 401B illustrate a spatialresampling of the temporally distributed group of data points 401A. Thespatially distributed group of data points 401B include a starting datapoint 401B1 (illustrated as a square), additional data points 401B2,401B3, etc., and a target/end data point 401BN (illustrated as acircle). As illustrated, the spatially distributed group of data points401B are spatially uniformly distributed. For example, the spatialdistance between data point 401B1 and data point 401B2 is the same asthe spatial distance between data point 401B2 and 401B3, and so forth.

In some implementations, resampling the temporally distributed group ofdata points to generate spatially distributed data points includesinterpolating one or more of the spatially distributed data points. Inother words, one or more of the spatially distributed data points may be“inferred” data points that are inferred based on the temporallydistributed data points. In some of those implementations, one or morespatially distributed data points are interpolated based on a totalspatial length of the temporal data points (i.e., a total length along atrajectory that passes through each of the temporal data points) and/orbased on a spatial length that is particular to that spatiallydistributed data point (i.e., the spatial length from the beginning ofthe trajectory to a corresponding temporal data point).

In some implementations, for a group of T+1 data points from ademonstration sampled uniformly in time at every δt time interval, thefollowing can be utilized to resample it uniformly along the trajectory(spatial sampling). In the following, the temporally distributed datapoints of each demonstration are represented by {ξ^(t=0), ξ^(t=δt), . .. , ξ^(t=Kδt)}, where ξ represents a state variable at the correspondingtime.

First, the total spatial length of the trajectory, and the spatiallength of the trajectory to any given data point (i) of the temporallydistributed data points, can be determined based on:

κ⁰=0

κ^(i)=Σ_(j=1) ^(i)∥ξ^(t=jδt)−ξ^(t=(j−1)δt) ∥∀i∈1 . . . K

Accordingly, the total spatial length of the trajectory is given byκ^(K). Moreover, the spatial length of the trajectory to any given datapoint (i) is given by κ^(i).

Next, the T+1 data points can be resampled based on:

^(i) =i(κ^(K) /T) ∀i∈0 . . . T

Finally, the new spatially distributed data points {ξ⁰, ξ¹, . . . ,ξ^(T)} can be determined from the temporally distributed data points{ξ^(t=0), ξ^(t=δt), . . . , ξ^(t=Kδt)} through interpolation of

{

⁰,

¹, . . . ,

^(T)} from {κ⁰, κ¹, . . . , κ^(T)}.

Automatically Determining a Potential Gradient

Some implementations described herein additionally or alternativelyrelate to automatically determining a potential gradient for one or moredata points (e.g., a potential gradient for all data points of ademonstration), and generating a control policy using the automaticallydetermined potential gradient. In some implementations, the potentialgradient to assign to each of the data points of a group is determinedbased on total spatial length, a total time, and/or average damping ofeach demonstration.

Automatically determining a potential gradient obviates the need fortedious user input of a desired potential gradient and/or mitigates therisk of an erroneously inputted potential gradient, which may have anegative impact on control policy learning and/or performance.Automatically determining a potential gradient according toimplementations disclosed herein may additionally or alternativelyenable a robot to utilize a control policy generated on such a potentialgradient to reach a target point in an amount of time that is generally(or strictly) consistent with the amount of time of the demonstration(s)on which the control policy is based.

In some implementations, the potential gradient to assign to each of thedata points of a group is determined based on the total spatial length(see explanation of total spatial length above), a total time, and/oraverage damping of each demonstration. In some of those implementations,the potential gradient is determined as follows: Using the nomenclatureof the explanation above, the total spatial length of the trajectory ofa demonstration is denoted by κ^(K) and the final time of thatdemonstration is denoted by Kδt. The average damping along thetrajectory can be determined, then a model that takes into account thedamping utilized to model the robot motion along the trajectory. Forexample, the model can be: acceleration=gradient−(averagedamping*velocity). A Laplace transformation can then be utilized tomodel the robot motion as a function of time. The potential gradient (γ)can then be determined as follows, and can be used as the potentialgradient for all of the data points of the group:

γ=((κ^(K)) ( d ²)/κδt d−e ^(−dκδt)

where d=(1/T+1)Σ_(i=0) ^(T)d₁ ^(i). The variable d₁ ^(i) denotes dampingparameters and is described in more detail below.

Prior Weight for Each Data Point

In some implementations of generating a control policy, multiple groupsof data points may be utilized, with each group being a uniquedemonstration from a corresponding kinesthetic teaching. While it isexpected that multiple demonstrations from multiple kinestheticteachings should improve the control policy, this may not always be thecase with certain prior techniques. This can be due to theover-population of data points in certain regions (e.g., close to thetarget point). Such over-population can cause the control policy toattract robot motion toward the target point more quickly than desired,causing it to deviate from the motion(s) of the demonstratedtrajectories.

Turning to FIG. 5A, a two-dimensional example is illustrated ofpositional components of three separate groups of data points 501A,501B, and 501C. The three separate groups of data points 501A, 501B, and501C are each a corresponding demonstration from a corresponding one ofthree different kinesthetic teachings.

Group of data points 501A includes a starting data point 501A1(illustrated as a square), additional data points 501A2, 501A3, etc.,and a target/end data point (which is illustrated as a circle 502 and isillustrated as overlapping with the target/end points of the other twogroups). Group of data points 501B includes a starting data point 501B1(illustrated as a square), additional data points 501B2, 501B3, etc.,and a target/end data point 502 (which is illustrated as a circle and isillustrated as overlapping with the target/end points of the other twogroups). Group of data points 501C includes a starting data point 501C1(illustrated as a square), additional data points 501C2, 501C3, etc.,and a target/end data point (which is illustrated as a circle 502 and isillustrated as overlapping with the target/end points of the other twogroups). Although the example of FIG. 5A is a two-dimensional example ofpositional components of data points, it is understood that in practicethe data points will often express position in a three-dimensional space(and may also express additional dimensions that define orientation).Also, although the example of FIG. 5A shows the target/end data point ofeach of the groups 501, 501B, and 501C being the same, it is understoodthat in practice the end data points will often vary from one another(e.g., vary by a few millimeters).

As appreciated from viewing FIG. 5A, the density of data points closerto the circle 502 is much greater than is the density of the data pointscloser to the starting points. For example, there is a greater densityof data points near data point 501A39 than there is near data point501A2. Again, such a greater density of data points causes thegenerating of the control policy (e.g., learning the potential function)to be unduly biased toward the greater density data points.

In view of these and/or other considerations, implementations disclosedherein assign a prior weight to each of the data points. The priorweight of a data point may be a function of the spatial distances fromthat data point to other data points (e.g., to each of the other datapoints of all three groups 501A, 501B, 501C). If a given data point hasa large quantity of additional data points that are spatially close, theprior weight of the given data point will be less than it would if thegiven data point did not have any spatially close additional datapoints. For example, in FIG. 5A, data point 501A39 will be weighted lessheavily than data point 501A3. The prior weight of each data point canbe used to determine an energy contribution of the data point and thatenergy contribution used in learning a potential function for use in thecontrol policy.

In some implementation, the prior weight (π^(i)) of each of the datapoints (i) of T data points from one or more groups/demonstrations maybe determined based on the following:

for i=1:T

δ=0

for k=1:T

δ=δ+e ^(−0.5(ξ) ^(i) ^(−ξ) ^(k) ⁾ ^(T) ^((Σ) ^(k) ⁾ ⁻¹ ^((ξ) ^(i) ^(−ξ)^(k) ⁾

π^(i) (the prior weight of i)=1/δ.

As mentioned above, the prior weight (π^(i)) of each of the data points(i) can be used to determine an energy contribution of each data point.For example, the prior weight can be used in the following equation thatdetermines the contribution of each data point at a query point ξ∈

^(d);

ω^(i)(ξ)=π^(i) e ^(−0.5(ξ−ξ) ^(i) ⁾ ^(T) ^((Σ) ^(i) ⁾ ⁻¹ ^((ξ−ξ) ^(I) ⁾

Additional description is provided below of use of the immediatelypreceding equation in generating a control policy.

FIG. 5A is described as an example of generating prior weights for datapoints of three separate demonstrations/groups. However, in someimplementations, prior weights may be determined for data points of asingle demonstration. For example, FIG. 5B illustrates a group of datapoints 501D that includes a starting data point 501D1 (illustrated as asquare), additional data points 501D2, 501D3, etc., and a target/enddata point 501DN (which is illustrated as a circle).

As appreciated from viewing FIG. 5B, the density of data points closerto the circle 501DN is greater than is the density of the data pointscloser to the starting point 501D1. Again, such a greater density ofdata points causes the generating of the control policy (e.g., learningthe potential function) to be unduly biased toward the greater densitydata points. If a given data point has a large quantity of additionaldata points that are spatially close, the prior weight of the given datapoint will be less than it would if the given data point did not haveany spatially close additional data points. For example, in FIG. 5B, aprior weight can be generated for data point 501DN and a prior weightcan also be generated for data point 501D2. The generated prior weightfor data point 501DN will be a “lesser weight” than that of data point501D2.

Non-Uniform Smoothness Parameters

In some implementations, smoothness parameters are utilized to controlthe region of influence of each data point in generating a controlpolicy. The region of influence of a data point is the spatial regionthat it influences. In certain prior techniques, the smoothnessparameter is scalar at each data point. In other words, it has a uniforminfluence in all directions. However, this provides less flexibility indeveloping a control policy. For example, for some control policies itmay be desirable for data points to have greater influence in somedirections than in other directions. For instance, it may be desirablefor a control policy for a task where it is important for the referencepoint to bias toward maintaining position in one or more particular axes(e.g., a “Z axis” when a table or other surface is to be contacted).

Accordingly, some implementations described herein define non-uniformsmoothness parameters for each data point, and use the non-uniformsmoothness parameters in generating a control policy. In someimplementations, a frame is associated with each data point and, at eachdata point, smoothness is defined with d parameters, where d is the taskdimension.

In some implementations, for a task specified in

^(d), where d is the task dimension, a frame U^(i)∈

^(d×d) is associated to each data point i as follows:

U ^(i) =[u ₁ ^(i) u ₂ ^(i) . . . u _(d) ^(i)], where u _(j) ^(i)∈

^(d) ∀j=1 . . . d

where u₁ ^(i) is chosen to be a unit vector along the direction of themotion (i.e., the demonstration velocity, {dot over (ξ)}^(t)), and theremaining unit vectors u₂ ^(i) to u_(d) ^(i) are randomly selected,provided by a user (e.g., through a user interface input device of arobot and/or computing device), or determined based on a taskparameter—with the constraint that U^(i) forms an orthonormal basis. Ateach data point local frame, smoothness is then defined with dparameters (in contrast to a single parameter):

Σ_(L) ^(i)=[(σ₁ ^(i))²(σ₂ ^(i))² . . . (σ_(d) ^(i))² ]I, where I∈

^(d×d) is a d-dimensional identity matrix.

With the above definition of U^(i) and Σ_(L) ^(i), the smoothness matrixin the task frame can be described as follows:

Σ^(i) =U ^(i)Σ_(L) ^(i)(U ^(i))^(T), where T stands for matrixtranspose.

This definition for smoothness increases the number of parameters forsmoothness from to Td. This affects various aspects of the generation ofa control policy that take into account smoothness of data points, suchas those set forth more fully below.

In some implementations where the remaining unit vectors of a frame aredetermined based on a task parameter, the task parameter may beidentified based on user input (e.g., through a user interface inputdevice), and may be selected to bias toward maintaining more conformancein one or more dimensions that are associated with the task parameter.The task parameter may, for example, particularly identify the task(e.g., cleaning a table), identify a class of tasks, and/or identify abiasing for the task (e.g., bias toward the ground). In someimplementations where the remaining unit vectors are determined based ona task parameter, the task parameter may additionally or alternativelybe inferred from demonstration(s) themselves, other sensor data (e.g.,based on objects detected from camera sensor(s)), etc.

Reducing Number of Parameters for Stiffness and Damping

In some implementations, stiffness and/or damping of each data point arealso utilized in generating a control policy. In certain priortechniques, the stiffness and damping at each data point are symmetricpositive definite d-dimensional matrices. This means that according tothose certain prior techniques, d(d+1)/2 parameters are needed to definestiffness at each data point and the same number of parameters areneeded to define damping at each data point.

However providing these stiffness and damping parameters can belaborious and/or computationally expensive. Using the definition offrame in the above section, the number of parameters for stiffness anddamping for a data point can be reduced from d(d+1)/2 to d withoutsignificant performance degradation.

For example, at each data point's local frame (U^(i)), stiffness can bedefined with d parameters, where:

S _(L) ^(i) =[s ₁ ^(i) s ₂ ^(i) . . . s_(d) ^(i) ]I, where I∈

^(d×d) is a d-dimensional identity matrix.

With the above definition of U^(i) and S_(L) ^(i), the stiffness matrixin the global frame can be described as follows:

S _(L) ^(i) =U ^(i) S _(L) ^(i)(U ^(i))^(T)

Similarly, the damping matrix can be described as:

D _(L) ^(i) =[d ₁ ^(i) d ₂ ^(i) . . . d _(d) ^(i) ]I (at each datapoint's local frame); and

D ^(i) =U ^(i) D _(L) ^(i)(U ^(i))^(T) (the damping matrix in the globalframe).

Removing Dependency on Generating Virtual Data Points

In certain prior techniques, so called “virtual data points” aregenerated from demonstration data points in order to ensure existence ofa solution in learning a potential function. However, in somesituations, virtual data points may interfere with data points fromactual demonstrations. For example, virtual data points are generated bymirroring demonstration data points around the origin. If there are twodemonstrations that approach a target point from opposite directions,their mirror around the origin (i.e., their virtual data points) couldinterfere with each other.

In view of these and/or other considerations, implementations disclosedherein obviate the need to have virtual data points by, for example,modifying one or more optimization constraints of certain priortechniques to ensure existence of a solution. Additional detail on themodified optimization constraint(s) are provided herein.

Example Environment

Turning now to FIG. 1, an example environment is illustrated in which arobot control policy may be generated according to variousimplementations described herein. The example environment includes oneor more robots 180 and a control policy system 120. Although the controlpolicy system 120 is illustrated as separate from the robot(s) 180, insome implementations one or more aspects of the control policy system120 may be implemented by a corresponding one of the one or more robots180 (e.g., by one or more processors of the robot). For example, in someimplementations each of the robot(s) 180 may include an instance of thecontrol policy system 120. In some implementations, one or more (e.g.,all) aspects of the control policy system 120 are implemented on acomputing device that is separate from the robot(s) 180, such as one orremote computing devices in network communication with the robot(s) 180.For example, one or more aspects of the control policy system 120 may beimplemented by remote computing device(s), the robot(s) 180 may transmit(via one or more networks) data from demonstration(s) to the remotecomputing devices, the remote computing device(s) may generate thecontrol policy based on the transmitted data, then transmit thegenerated control policy back to the robot(s) 180.

During a kinesthetic teaching / physical manipulation by a user of oneof the robot(s) 180, sensor data is generated by the robot. The sensordata is provided to the control policy system 120. The control policysystem 120 generates a group of data points based on the sensor data ofthe kinesthetic teaching and uses the group of data points in generatinga control policy. The control policy is provided for use by one or moreof the robot(s) 180 (the same robot of the kinesthetic teaching and/oradditional robot(s)). Such robot(s) 180 use the control policy toselectively control one or more of its actuators based on the controlpolicy. For example, the control policy may be invoked by such robot(s)180 in response to detection of an object associated with the controlpolicy, a task associated with the control policy, etc. and used by therobot in regulating both motion and interaction with the environment. Asdescribed herein, in some implementations, sensor data from multiplekinesthetic teachings are provided to the control policy system 120 andutilized by the system 120 in generating a single control policy. Thesensor data from each of the kinesthetic teachings may be utilized togenerate a corresponding demonstration/group of data points. Sensor datafrom multiple kinesthetic teachings may all be provided by the samerobot and/or by different robots.

The control policy system 120 includes a data engine 122 and a learningengine 124. In some implementations, more or fewer engines may beprovided. In some implementations, the data engine 122 resamples atemporally distributed group of data points to generate a spatiallydistributed group of data points, and provides the spatially distributedgroup of data points to learning engine 124 for use in generating acontrol policy. In some implementations, the data engine 122additionally or alternatively automatically generates a potentialgradient for a group of data points, assigns the potential gradient tothe data points of the group, and provides the assigned potentialgradient to learning engine 124 for use in generating a control policy.

The learning engine 124 generates a control policy using one or moregroups of data points that are each based on robot sensor data from acorresponding kinesthetic teaching. In some implementations, ingenerating the control policy, the learning engine 124 utilizes thegroup(s) of data points in learning a non-parametric potential functionfor use in the control policy, where the non-parametric potentialfunction has a global minimum that is based on target point(s) of thegroup(s) of data points. In some of those implementations, the learningengine 124 further utilizes the group(s) of data points in learning adissipative field for use in the control policy. In someimplementations, the learning engine 124 solves constrained optimizationproblem(s) in learning the potential function and/or the dissipativefield. While the global minimum of a learned potential function will bebased on target point(s) of the groups(s) of data points, it isunderstood that in many situations it will not strictly conform to thetarget point(s). Moreover, where multiple target point(s) of multiplegroup(s) are provided, it is understood that those target point(s) maynot all strictly conform to one another.

In implementations where the data engine 122 provides spatiallydistributed group(s) of data points and/or automatically generatedpotential gradient(s), the learning engine 124 generates the controlpolicy based on such provided data. In some implementations, thelearning engine 124 additionally or alternatively determines a priorweight for each of the data points of provided group(s) of data points,and uses the prior weights in generating the control policy. In someimplementations, the learning engine 124 additionally or alternativelydefines non-uniform smoothness parameters for each of the data points ofprovided group(s) of data points, and uses the non-uniform smoothnessparameters in generating the control policy. The non-uniform smoothnessparameters may be defined based on input provided by a user (e.g.,provided via a user interface input device). In some implementations,the learning engine 124 additionally or alternatively defines stiffnessand/or damping with d parameters for each of the data points of providedgroup(s) of data points (where d is the task dimension), and uses suchdefined parameters in generating the control policy. In someimplementations, the learning engine 124 additionally or alternativelygenerates the control policy independent of generating any virtual datapoints that mirror corresponding ones of the data points of providedgroup(s) of data points.

Example of a Kinesthetic Teaching

FIG. 2 illustrates an example of a robot 180A that may be one of therobot(s) 180 utilized in FIG. 1. FIG. 2 also illustrates a user 100physically grasping an end effector 186 of the robot 180A duringphysical manipulation of the robot 180A by the user. Also illustrated inFIG. 2 is a spray can 105 resting on a surface 109. As indicated in FIG.2, the illustrated robot 180A includes a base 182 and eight actuators184 a-h that provide degrees of freedom for the robot and provide therobot 180A with kinematic redundancy. It is noted that the actualactuators 184 a-h are located “under” the exterior shell of the robot180A, but are labeled with reference to the exterior shell in FIG. 2 forthe sake of simplicity. Robot 180A may include other actuators, such asone or more actuators that control opening/closing of actuable membersof end effector 186, but those are not labeled in FIG. 2 for the sake ofclarity and brevity. Robot 180A may be physically manipulated by theuser 100 to cause the robot 180A traverse any one of a plurality ofpossible trajectories when moving a reference point of end effector 186from a starting location to a target location. In some implementations,the robot 180A may be in a gravity compensated mode during all orportions of the physical manipulation of the robot 180A by the user.

The trajectory 101 of FIG. 2 illustrates a trajectory followed by areference point of the end effector 186 during the demonstration (thetrajectory is dictated by the physical manipulation of the robot 180A bythe user 100). The demonstration started with the reference point at astarting point 102 and ends, as shown in FIG. 2, with the referencepoint at a target point 103. Sensor data may be generated by the robot180A during the demonstration, such as sensor data that indicates thepose (i.e., the position and optionally the orientation) of the endeffector 186. The sensor data that indicates the pose of the endeffector may be, for example, sensor data from one or more positionsensors associated with actuators 184 a-h that control the pose of theend effector. As described herein, the sensor data may be utilized togenerate the data points. For example, the data points may be describedin joint space (e.g., as the positions of each of the actuators 184 a-h)and/or task space (e.g., as the position and orientation of the endeffector 186, as derived from the position sensors).

Although not illustrated, robot 180A may also include and/or be incommunication with one or more user interface input devices, such as abutton or other user interface element located on an exterior surface ofthe robot 180A, a virtual user interface element provided via a tabletor other computing device in communication with the robot 180A, and/or amicrophone included with the robot 180A and/or in communication with therobot. In some of those implementations a user may provide userinterface input via the user interface element to, for example: indicatethe initiation and/or conclusion of a demonstration.

Although a particular robot 180A is illustrated in FIG. 2, additionaland/or alternative robots may be utilized, including robots having otherrobot arm forms, robots having a humanoid form, robots that move via oneor more wheels (e.g., other self-balancing robots), and so forth. Also,although a particular grasping end effector 186 is illustrated in FIG.2, additional and/or alternative end effectors may be utilized.

Example of Generating a Control Policy

As described herein, implementations of this specification are relatedto various improvements in generating a control policy that regulatesboth motion control and robot interaction with the environment and/orthat includes a learned non-parametric potential function and/ordissipative field. One example of generating such a control policy isnow provided in additional detail.

Note that state variables can be composed of both linear and angularmotions. When describing various examples, without loss of generality, astate variable is considered that is defined in Cartesian space with thefollowing structure: ξ=[Ξ₁, ξ₂, ξ₃]^(T)=[x y z]^(T). Such Cartesianspace definition is provided for simplicity. It is understood thatvarious techniques described herein are adaptable to definitions ofstate variables in other spaces, such as joint space. Moreover, statevariables may also encode orientation in addition to position.

Consider a state variable ξ∈

^(d) that can be used to unambiguously define the state of a roboticsystem. The state variable ξ, for instance, could represent the robot'sgeneralized joint angles, the position and orientation of theend-effector, or solely position or orientation of the end-effector. Acontrol policy, τ_(c)∈

^(d), can be defined as the negative gradient of a scalar time-invariantpotential function Φ(ξ):

^(d)→

⁺ minus a dissipative field Ψ(ξ, {dot over (ξ)}):

^(d×d)→

^(d):

τ_(c)=∇Φ(ξ)−Ψ(ξ, {dot over (ξ)})

As described in more detail below, generating the control policy caninclude learning the potential function Φ(ξ) and the dissipative fieldΨ(ξ, {dot over (ξ)}) based on one or more demonstrations/groups of datapoints. When the state variable ξ is defined as the generalized jointangles, τ_(C) directly corresponds to the actual torque commands thatshould be sent by a robot control system to the actuators. For example,in generating torque commands at a given time instant, the robot controlsystem can apply the state variables of the robot at that time instantto the control policy to generate torque commands, and provide thosetorque commands to its actuators. When ξ is defined in task space (incontrast to joint space), the robot control system can use anoperational space formulation to compute the actuators torque commandfrom τ_(c).

Assume that N kinesthetic teachings are performed through usermanipulation of one or more robots. Further assume Ndemonstrations/groups of data points that are based on robot sensoroutput during the kinesthetic teachings, with each group of data pointsbeing based on sensor data from a corresponding one of the kinestheticteachings. The data points can be represented as {ξ^(t,n), {dot over(ξ)}^(t,n), τ^(t,n)}_(t=0, n=1) ^(T) ^(n) ^(,N) and their correspondingstiffness property represented as {S^(t,n)}_(t=0, n=1) ^(T) ^(n) ^(,N),where S^(t,n)∈

^(d×d) are positive definite matrices. Without loss of generality,further assume the task of the demonstration(s) is defined in a targetframe of reference, i.e., ξ^(T) ^(n) ^(,n)=ξ*=0 ∀n∈1 . . . N. This canbe achieved by a translation of the demonstration(s). To avoid presenceof several indices, the notation can be simplified by concatenating allthe demonstrations for each variable into one single vector. Thus,instead of referring to the data points as {(.)^(t,n)}_(t=0, n=1) ^(T)^(n) ^(,N), the notation {(.)_(i)}_(i=1) ^(T) is sometimes used hereinwhere T=Σ_(n=1) ^(N)T^(n) is the total number of data points. The indexi can be computed for each (t, n). To avoid addressing thecorrespondence problem, demonstration trajectories can be shown from therobot's point of view, by the user guiding the robot passively throughthe task (i.e., kinesthetic teaching).

The stiffness properties of data points can be determined utilizing oneor more techniques. For example, the stiffness property of a data pointcan be based on a direct mapping from sensor data of a pressure sensorof the robot (e.g., mounted on a “wrist” of the robot). For instance,the “harder” a user presses on the pressure sensor during ademonstration at the time of the data point, the greater the stiffnessproperty can be. Also, for example, the stiffness property of a datapoint can additionally or alternatively be based on an inverselyproportional mapping to the spatial variance of the data points of ademonstration near the time of the data point (e.g., greater variance,less stiffness). As yet another example, the stiffness property of adata point can additionally or alternatively be based on a function ofother variables, such as a task-dependent variable.

As described herein, in some implementations where data points of ademonstration are uniformly distributed over time, they may be resampledto generate a spatial group of spatially distributed data points. Insome of those implementations, the spatial group of spatiallydistributed data points may be used in generating the control policy inlieu of the data points that are uniformly distributed over time. Forexample, the spatial group may be used in learning the potentialfunction of the control policy.

An energy element ϕ^(i):

^(d)→

⁺ can be associated to each of the demonstration data points ξ^(i):

ϕ^(i)(ξ)=ϕ₀ ^(i)+1/2(ξ−ξ^(i))^(T) S ^(i)(ξ−ξ^(i)) ∀i∈1 . . . T

where ϕ₀ ^(i)∈

⁺ is a constant scalar, and (.)^(T) denotes the transpose. For eachenergy element ϕ^(i)(ξ), the force by which a particle ξ is attracted tothe center ξ^(i) is given by −S^(i)(ξ−ξ^(i)). Thus the higher the S^(i),the more the attraction force is.

A kernel regression method can be utilized to build the total energy(potential) function based on the energy elements ϕ^(i)(ξ). At a querypoint ξ∈

^(d), the contribution of each energy element can be determined usingthe Gaussian kernel:

ω^(i)(ξ)=π^(i) e ^(−0.5(ξ−ξ) ^(i) ⁾ ^(T) ^((Σ) ^(i) ⁾ ⁻¹ ^((ξ−ξ) ^(i) ⁾

where Σ^(i) is the smoothness matrix in the task frame as describedherein (i.e., a smoothness matrix that optionally defines non-uniformsmoothness parameters).

As described herein, the prior weight of each data point (ni) can be afunction of the spatial distances from that data point to additionaldata points of the groups of data points. In some implementation, theprior weight (π^(i)) of each of the data points (i) of T data points maybe determined based on the following:

for i=1:T

δ=0

for k=1:T

δ=δ+e ^(−0.5(ξ) ^(i) ^(−ξ) ^(k) ⁾ ^(T) ^((Σ) ^(k) ⁾ ⁻¹ ^((ξ−ξ) ^(k) ⁾

The total potential energy at ξ is given by:

${\Phi (\xi)} = \frac{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{T}{{\omega^{i}(\xi)}{\varphi^{i}(\xi)}}}{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{T}{\omega^{j}(\xi)}}$

The immediately preceding notation can be simplified by denoting Σ_(i=1)^(T) with Σ_(i) and defining the normalized weights {tilde over(ω)}^(i)(ξ) by:

${{\overset{\sim}{\omega}}^{i}(\xi)} = {\frac{\omega^{i}(\xi)}{\sum\limits_{j}{\omega^{j}(\xi)}}{\forall{i \in {1\mspace{14mu} \ldots \mspace{14mu} T}}}}$

In some implementations where the need to have virtual data points isobviated, the normalized weights may instead be defined by:

∥ξ−ξ*∥≥ε_(ξ):

${{\overset{\sim}{\omega}}^{i}(\xi)} = {\frac{\omega^{i}(\xi)}{\sum\limits_{j}{\omega^{j}(\xi)}}{\forall{i \in {1\mspace{14mu} \ldots \mspace{14mu} T}}}}$

else:

{tilde over (ω)}^(i)(ξ)=0 ∀i∈1 . . . T−1

{tilde over (ω)}^(T)(ξ)=1

where ∈_(ξ) is a positive threshold value, such as a value defined by auser.

Regardless of the definition of the normalized weights, eithersimplification enables the total potential energy at ξ to be simplified(notation-wise) to:

${\Phi (\xi)} = {\sum\limits_{i}{{{\overset{\sim}{\omega}}^{i}(\xi)}{\varphi^{i}(\xi)}}}$

The nonlinear weights ω^(i)(ξ) have the following two properties:0<ω^(i)(ξ)≤1 and Σ_(i)ω^(i)(ξ)=1, ∀ξ∈

^(d). Considering these properties and the fact that ϕ^(i)(ξ) arepositive scalars yields the relation Φ(ξ)≥0, ∀ξ∈

^(d).

A simple linear dissipative field ψ^(i)({dot over (ξ)}):

^(d)→

^(d) can also be associated to each data point, which is given by

ψ^(i)({dot over (ξ)})=D ^(i){dot over (ξ)}

where D^(i)∈

^(d×d) are positive definite matrices. The total dissipative energy canbe computed through nonlinear weighted sum of each dissipative elementψ^(i)({dot over (ξ)}):

Ψ^(i)(ξ, {dot over (ξ)})=Σ_(i){tilde over (ω)}^(i)(ξ)ψ^(i)({dot over(ξ)})

The control policy can be obtained by taking the gradient ofΦ(ξ)=Σ_(i){tilde over (ω)}^(i)(ξ)ϕ^(i)(ξ) and substituting it, as wellas Ψ^(i)(ξ, {dot over (ξ)})=Σ_(i){tilde over (ω)}^(i)(ξ)ψ({dot over(ξ)}), into τ_(c)=−∇Φ(ξ)−Ψ(ξ, {dot over (ξ)})

With a few rearrangements, the obtained control policy can berepresented as:

τ_(c)=Σ_(i){tilde over (ω)}^(i)(ξ)(ϕ^(i)(ξ)−Φ(ξ))(Σ^(i)⁻¹(ξ−ξ^(i))−{tilde over (ω)}^(i)(ξ)(S ^(i)(ξ−ξ^(i))+D ^(i){dot over(ξ)})

It is noted that there are three main terms in the obtained controlpolicy:

τ_(nominal) ^(i)={tilde over(ω)}^(i)(ξ)(ϕ^(i)(ξ)−Φ(ξ))(Σ^(i))⁻¹(ξ−ξ^(i))

τ_(attract) ¹=−{tilde over (ω)}¹(ξ) S ^(i)(ξ−ξ^(i)); and

τ_(damp) ^(i)=−{tilde over (ω)}^(i)(ξ)D ^(i){dot over (ξ)}

Using the immediately preceding three main terms, the control policy canbe rewritten as:

$\tau_{c} = {{\sum\limits_{i}\tau_{nominal}^{i}} + {\sum\limits_{i}\tau_{attact}^{i}} + {\sum\limits_{i}\tau_{damp}^{i}}}$

The terms τ_(nominal) ^(i) are mainly responsible to generate thenominal motion. τ_(nominal) is a linear function of ϕ₀ ^(i) which, asdescribed herein, can be learned from the data points by solving aconvex constrained optimization problem. Further, τ_(nominal) linearlydepends on the non-uniform stiffness matrices in the global frame(Σ^(i)). The terms τ_(atttract) ^(i) are mainly responsible to generatethe attraction force towards the nominal motion. In other words, theterms τ_(atttract) ^(i) mostly determine the impedance property (i.e.,how much the robot should resist when perturbed along the directionorthogonal to the nominal motion). The terms τ_(damp) ^(j) act asdissipating elements, pumping the energy out of the system.

With the above overview of the control policy, additional description isnow provided of learning the control policy from data points of userdemonstrations. The centers ξ^(i) and their associated stiffness S^(i)are known and given by the data points of the demonstrations. It nowremains to determine the value of Σ^(i), ϕ₀ ^(i), and D^(i) such thatthe target point becomes the attractor of the potential function Φ(ξ)and the robot follows the same/similar velocity-profile as shown by thedemonstrations.

As described herein, in some implementations the potential gradient (γ)of all data points of a group can be determined as:

γ=((κ^(K))( d ²)/κδtd×−e ^(−dκδt) ∀i∈1 . . . T−1

where d=(1/T+1)Σ_(i=0) ^(T)d₁ ^(i).

As the value of ∇Φ(ξ) only depends on ϕ₀ ^(i), the optimization learningparameters Θ is a vector created from concatenation of all ϕ₀ ^(i)(i.e.,Θ=[ϕ₀ ¹ . . . ϕ_hd 0 ^(T)]). An estimate of Θ can be obtained by solvingthe following constrained auadratic optimization problem:

${\min\limits_{\Theta}{J(\Theta)}} = {\frac{1}{T}{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{T}{{{\nabla{\Phi \left( {\xi^{i};\Theta} \right)}} + \gamma^{i}}}^{2}}}$subject  to $\begin{matrix}{\varphi_{0}^{i + 1} \leq \varphi_{0}^{i}} & {{{\forall i} = {1\mspace{14mu} \ldots \mspace{14mu} T}},{i \notin \Omega},{{i + 1} \notin \Omega}} \\{0 \leq \varphi_{0}^{i}} & {{{\forall i} = {1\mspace{14mu} \ldots \mspace{14mu} T}},{i \in \Omega}} \\{{\nabla{\Phi (\xi)}} = 0} & {\xi = \xi^{*}}\end{matrix}$

where Ω is the set of indices that corresponds to the last point of eachdemonstration trajectory, which by construction is placed at the targetpoint ξ*:

Ω={i|ξ^(i)=ξ*}

In implementations where the need to have virtual data points isobviated, the condition: ∇Φ(ξ)=0 ξ=ξ*, may be replaced with:

∥∇Φ(ξ)∥≤∈_(Φ) ξ=ξ*

where ∈_(Φ) is a positive threshold value, such as a value defined bythe user.

The optimization problem given above has T parameters with T inequalityconstraints and d equality constraints. The optimization problem can betransformed into a constrained quadratic optimization problem after afew rearrangements. Accordingly, despite the high-dimensionality of thisoptimization problem, it can be efficiently solved (e.g., within a fewseconds) using a solver such as cvxgen.

FIG. 3 is provided for a graphical representation of an example of apotential function (Φ(ξ)) 360 of a control policy according to variousimplementations described herein. The potential function 360 capturesboth motion generation and variable impedance control. The energy levelsare shown by “horizontal” lines, two of which are annotated as 363A and363B. The energy gradients are shown by “vertical” lines, two of whichare annotated as 364A and 364B. The potential energy ϕ is learned fromdata points of a demonstration. The data points of the demonstration areillustrated as partial circles (two of which are annotated as 361A and361B). The potential energy ϕ can be generalized as a valley with twosignificant parameters: a slope and a curvature. The slope captures themotion behavior. If a virtual ball is dropped on any of thedemonstration data points, the virtual ball follows the rest of thedemonstration with an acceleration governed by the slope and stops atthe target point 366 (the local minimum). The solid black arrows in FIG.3 (two of which are annotated as 362A and 362B) highlight the motion ofsuch an example due to the slope. The curvature is perpendicular to thedesired direction of motion and encodes the stiffness behavior. Thesurface of FIG. 3, outlined by a solid line indicated as 365, visualizesthe curvature at a demonstration data point. The higher the curvaturethe more resistance the virtual ball shows to perturbations, hencereturning faster to the nominal motion. Though not illustrated in thisfigure, the potential function also optionally encodes the dampingparameter throughout the state space to avoid oscillation. Note thatboth slope and curvature are state dependent parameters and could varythroughout the motion.

Example Method

FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating an example method 600 according tovarious implementations described herein. For convenience, theoperations of the flow chart are described with reference to a systemthat performs the operations. This system may include engines 122 and/or124 of control policy system 120, which may be implemented by one ormore components of a robot, such as a processor and/or robot controlsystem of one or more of the robots 180; and/or may be implemented byone or more computing device(s) that are separate from a robot, such ascomputing device 810. Moreover, while operations of method 600 are shownin a particular order, this is not meant to be limiting. One or moreoperations may be reordered, omitted, or added.

At block 652, the system receives one or more groups of data points.Each group of data points is generated based on robot sensor data duringa physical manipulation of a corresponding robot. As one example, thesystem can receive one group of data points that are based on akinesthetic teaching of a demonstration performed on a correspondingrobot. As another example, the system can receive a first group of datapoints and a second group of data points. The first group can be basedon a first kinesthetic teaching performed on a corresponding robot. Thesecond group can be based on a second kinesthetic teaching performed onthe same corresponding robot, or on a different corresponding robot.

At block 654, the system resamples each of the one or more groups ofblock 652 to generate spatial group(s) of spatially distributed datapoints. For example, a group of data points received at block 652 can beuniformly distributed over time, and the system can resample that groupof data points uniformly in space (in contrast to time).

At block 656, the system generates a potential gradient for the datapoints of each group. For example, the system can generate a potentialgradient for the data points of a given group based on a total spatiallength, a total time, and/or average damping of the given group.

At block 658, the system generates a robot control policy based on thegroup(s) of data points. In some implementations, block 658 includesblock 660, block 662, and/or block 664.

At block 660, in generating the control policy, the system uses thespatial group(s) of spatially distributed data points generated in block654 and/or the potential gradient(s) generated in block 656. Forexample, the system can use the spatial group(s) of spatiallydistributed data points generated in block 654 in lieu of the temporallydistributed group(s) of data points. Also, for example, the system canadditionally or alternatively utilize, for the data points of eachgroup, a potential gradient for that group generated in block 658.

At block 662, in generating the control policy, the system generatesprior weights for the data points and determines energy contributionsfor the data points based on the prior weights. In some implementations,block 662 is performed in response to multiple groups of data pointsbeing received at block 652. In some implementations, the systemgenerates the prior weight for each data points as a function of thespatial distances from that data point to other data points (e.g.,spatial distances from that data point to other data points of allgroups/demonstrations).

At block 664, in generating the control policy, the system assignsnon-uniform smoothness parameters to the data points, and uses thenon-uniform smoothness parameters. In some implementations, the systemassociates a frame with each data point and, at each data point, definessmoothness with d parameters, where d is the task dimension. In someimplementations, at block 664, the system alternatively assigns uniformsmoothness parameters to the data points (in lieu of the non-uniformsmoothness parameters), and uses the uniform smoothness parameters ingenerating the control policy.

Although not illustrated, in some implementations, block 658additionally and/or alternatively includes defining and utilizing areduced number of stiffness and/or damping parameters for each of thedata points and/or generating the control policy without the utilizationof virtual data points.

At block 668, the system controls one or more robots based on thecontrol policy. For example, in some implementations the control policydirectly corresponds to the actual torque commands that should be sentby a robot control system to the actuators. In those implementations, ingenerating torque commands at a given time instant, the system can applythe state variables of a robot at that time instant to the controlpolicy to generate torque commands, and provide those torque commands toits actuators. In some other implementations, the system can use anoperational space formulation and/or other formulations to determinetorque commands and/or other control commands based on the controlpolicy.

Method 600 sets forth an example according to implementations disclosedherein. However, as set forth above, in some implementations one or moreoperations may be reordered, omitted, or added. As one example, in someimplementations block 662 may be omitted. As another example, in someimplementations block 656 may be omitted and block 660 may include thesystem using the spatial group(s) of spatially distributed data points,but omit using automatically determined potential gradient(s) (e.g.,manually user set potential gradient(s) may instead be utilized). As yetanother example, in some implementations, block 654 may be omitted andblock 660 may include using temporal group(s) of temporally distributeddata points in lieu of spatial groups of spatially distributed datapoints.

Example Architecture of a Robot

FIG. 7 schematically depicts an example architecture of a robot 700. Therobot 700 includes a robot control system 702, one or more operationalcomponents 704 a-n, and one or more sensors 708 a-m. The sensors 708 a-mmay include, for example, vision sensors (e.g., camera(s), 3D scanners),light sensors, pressure sensors, positional sensors, pressure wavesensors (e.g., microphones), proximity sensors, accelerometers,gyroscopes, thermometers, barometers, and so forth. While sensors 708a-m are depicted as being integral with robot 700, this is not meant tobe limiting. In some implementations, sensors 708 a-m may be locatedexternal to robot 700, e.g., as standalone units.

Operational components 704 a-n may include, for example, one or more endeffectors (e.g., grasping end effectors) and/or one or more servo motorsor other actuators to effectuate movement of one or more components ofthe robot. For example, the robot 700 may have multiple degrees offreedom and each of the actuators may control actuation of the robot 700within one or more of the degrees of freedom responsive to controlcommands provided by the robot control system 702 (e.g., torque and/orother commands generated based on a control policy). As used herein, theterm actuator encompasses a mechanical or electrical device that createsmotion (e.g., a motor), in addition to any driver(s) that may beassociated with the actuator and that translate received controlcommands into one or more signals for driving the actuator. Accordingly,providing a control command to an actuator may comprise providing thecontrol command to a driver that translates the control command intoappropriate signals for driving an electrical or mechanical device tocreate desired motion.

The robot control system 702 may be implemented in one or moreprocessors, such as a CPU, GPU, and/or other controller(s) of the robot700. In some implementations, the robot 700 may comprise a “brain box”that may include all or aspects of the control system 702. For example,the brain box may provide real time bursts of data to the operationalcomponents 704 a-n, with each of the real time bursts comprising a setof one or more control commands that dictate, inter alio, the parametersof motion (if any) for each of one or more of the operational components704 a-n. As described herein, the control commands can be at leastselectively generated by the control system 702 based on a controlpolicy generated according to one or more techniques disclosed herein.

Although control system 702 is illustrated in FIG. 7 as an integral partof the robot 700, in some implementations, all or aspects of the controlsystem 702 may be implemented in a component that is separate from, butin communication with, robot 700. For example, all or aspects of controlsystem 702 may be implemented on one or more computing devices that arein wired and/or wireless communication with the robot 700, such ascomputing device 810.

Example Computing Device

FIG. 8 is a block diagram of an example computing device 810 that mayoptionally be utilized to perform one or more aspects of techniquesdescribed herein. Computing device 810 typically includes at least oneprocessor 814 which communicates with a number of peripheral devices viabus subsystem 812. These peripheral devices may include a storagesubsystem 824, including, for example, a memory subsystem 825 and a filestorage subsystem 826, user interface output devices 820, user interfaceinput devices 822, and a network interface subsystem 816. The input andoutput devices allow user interaction with computing device 810. Networkinterface subsystem 816 provides an interface to outside networks and iscoupled to corresponding interface devices in other computing devices.

User interface input devices 822 may include a keyboard, pointingdevices such as a mouse, trackball, touchpad, or graphics tablet, ascanner, a touchscreen incorporated into the display, audio inputdevices such as voice recognition systems, microphones, and/or othertypes of input devices. In general, use of the term “input device” isintended to include all possible types of devices and ways to inputinformation into computing device 810 or onto a communication network.

User interface output devices 820 may include a display subsystem, aprinter, a fax machine, or non-visual displays such as audio outputdevices. The display subsystem may include a cathode ray tube (CRT), aflat-panel device such as a liquid crystal display (LCD), a projectiondevice, or some other mechanism for creating a visible image. Thedisplay subsystem may also provide non-visual display such as via audiooutput devices. In general, use of the term “output device” is intendedto include all possible types of devices and ways to output informationfrom computing device 810 to the user or to another machine or computingdevice.

Storage subsystem 824 stores programming and data constructs thatprovide the functionality of some or all of the modules describedherein. For example, the storage subsystem 824 may include the logic toperform selected aspects of the method 600 of FIG. 6.

These software modules are generally executed by processor 814 alone orin combination with other processors. Memory 825 used in the storagesubsystem 824 can include a number of memories including a main randomaccess memory (RAM) 830 for storage of instructions and data duringprogram execution and a read only memory (ROM) 832 in which fixedinstructions are stored. A file storage subsystem 826 can providepersistent storage for program and data files, and may include a harddisk drive, a floppy disk drive along with associated removable media, aCD-ROM drive, an optical drive, or removable media cartridges. Themodules implementing the functionality of certain implementations may bestored by file storage subsystem 826 in the storage subsystem 824, or inother machines accessible by the processor(s) 814.

Bus subsystem 812 provides a mechanism for letting the variouscomponents and subsystems of computing device 810 communicate with eachother as intended. Although bus subsystem 812 is shown schematically asa single bus, alternative implementations of the bus subsystem may usemultiple busses.

Computing device 810 can be of varying types including a workstation,server, computing cluster, blade server, server farm, or any other dataprocessing system or computing device. Due to the ever-changing natureof computers and networks, the description of computing device 810depicted in FIG. 8 is intended only as a specific example for purposesof illustrating some implementations. Many other configurations ofcomputing device 810 are possible having more or fewer components thanthe computing device depicted in FIG. 8.

While several implementations have been described and illustratedherein, a variety of other means and/or structures for performing thefunction and/or obtaining the results and/or one or more of theadvantages described herein may be utilized, and each of such variationsand/or modifications is deemed to be within the scope of theimplementations described herein. More generally, all parameters,dimensions, materials, and configurations described herein are meant tobe exemplary and that the actual parameters, dimensions, materials,and/or configurations will depend upon the specific application orapplications for which the teachings is/are used. Those skilled in theart will recognize, or be able to ascertain using no more than routineexperimentation, many equivalents to the specific implementationsdescribed herein. It is, therefore, to be understood that the foregoingimplementations are presented by way of example only and that, withinthe scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereto,implementations may be practiced otherwise than as specificallydescribed and claimed. Implementations of the present disclosure aredirected to each individual feature, system, article, material, kit,and/or method described herein. In addition, any combination of two ormore such features, systems, articles, materials, kits, and/or methods,if such features, systems, articles, materials, kits, and/or methods arenot mutually inconsistent, is included within the scope of the presentdisclosure.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method implemented by one or more processors,comprising: determining a total spatial length of a group of datapoints, the group of data points generated based on sensor data from oneor more sensors of a robot during physical manipulation of the robot,the physical manipulation being by a user to traverse a reference pointof the robot from an initial point to a target point; generating apotential gradient based on the total spatial length, wherein generatingthe potential gradient based on the total spatial length comprises:calculating the potential gradient as a function of the total spatiallength, an average damping of the group, and a total time of the group;assigning the potential gradient to each of the data points of thegroup; generating a control policy that regulates both robot motion androbot interaction with an environment, wherein generating the controlpolicy comprises using the data points with the assigned potentialgradient in learning a potential function for use in the control policy,the potential function having a global minimum based on the targetpoint; and controlling the robot or an additional robot based on thecontrol policy.
 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising, for eachof the data points of the group: assigning non-uniform smoothnessparameters to the data point; wherein generating the control policyfurther comprises using the non-uniform smoothness parameters for thedata points in learning the potential function.
 3. The method of claim2, further comprising determining the non-uniform smoothness parametersbased on a task parameter associated with the physical manipulation. 4.The method of claim 3, further comprising identifying the task parameterbased on user input provided through a user interface input device. 5.The method of claim 1, wherein generating the control policy isindependent of generating any virtual data points that mirrorcorresponding ones of the data points.
 6. A method implemented by one ormore processors, comprising: determining a total spatial length of agroup of data points, the group of data points generated based on sensordata from one or more sensors of a robot during physical manipulation ofthe robot, the physical manipulation being by a user to traverse areference point of the robot from an initial point to a target point;generating a potential gradient based on the total spatial length;assigning the potential gradient to each of the data points of thegroup; generating a control policy that regulates both robot motion androbot interaction with an environment, wherein generating the controlpolicy comprises using the data points with the assigned potentialgradient in learning a potential function for use in the control policy,the potential function having a global minimum based on the targetpoint, and wherein generating the control policy is independent ofgenerating any virtual data points that mirror corresponding ones of thedata points; and controlling the robot or an additional robot based onthe control policy.
 7. The method of claim 6, further comprising, foreach of the data points of the group: assigning non-uniform smoothnessparameters to the data point; wherein generating the control policyfurther comprises using the non-uniform smoothness parameters for thedata points in learning the potential function.
 8. The method of claim7, further comprising determining the non-uniform smoothness parametersbased on a task parameter associated with the physical manipulation. 9.The method of claim 8, further comprising identifying the task parameterbased on user input provided through a user interface input device. 10.A method implemented by one or more processors, comprising: determininga total spatial length of a group of data points, the group of datapoints generated based on sensor data from one or more sensors of arobot during physical manipulation of the robot, the physicalmanipulation being by a user to traverse a reference point of the robotfrom an initial point to a target point; generating a potential gradientbased on the total spatial length; assigning the potential gradient toeach of the data points of the group; for each of the data points of thegroup, assigning non-uniform smoothness parameters to the data point;wherein generating the control policy further comprises using thenon-uniform smoothness parameters for the data points in learning thepotential function generating a control policy that regulates both robotmotion and robot interaction with an environment, wherein generating thecontrol policy comprises using the data points with the assignedpotential gradient, and using the non-uniform smoothness parameters forthe data points, in learning a potential function for use in the controlpolicy, the potential function having a global minimum based on thetarget point; and controlling the robot or an additional robot based onthe control policy.
 11. The method of claim 10, further comprisingdetermining the non-uniform smoothness parameters based on a taskparameter associated with the physical manipulation.
 12. The method ofclaim 11, further comprising identifying the task parameter based onuser input provided through a user interface input device.